Avatar Review

'Avatar' is a film unlike anything ever seen before.... Sort of.

Over the past few days, a bunch of my friends asked me what I thought of the new movie Avatar. Given that my stance has been contrary to what most people have said about it, I have found myself explaining my opinions over and over again. To finally purge myself of all my feelings and educate others about an unheard opinion, I finally decided to write this review (yes, this one that you are reading right now). This review is not an outlet for me to be smug or controversial, but ultimately to educate. I’m aware that I am of a vast minority — extremely vast, almost infinitesimal — and it is for that reason that I am writing this review.

Hello, my name is Boone… and I didn’t like the movie Avatar.

Now before you pick up your pitchforks and torches and chase me into a rickety windmill, give me a chance to explain myself. Perhaps in doing so, you will walk away a richer, more enlightened person for listening to a contrary position. Or perhaps you’ll be even angrier at me, cementing your opinion that I am a royal doucheface. Either way, this will be quite an adventure!

To get in your good graces, I’ll start by saying the things that I enjoyed about the film. Avatar, from a technical standpoint, is fantastic. The special effects, editing and sound design are solid, and the final action setpiece is frenetic and well-done….

And thus concludes the positive portion of this review.

The visuals for 'Avatar' are a delight -- creative and wholly original.

One of the biggest problems that I have with Avatar is that it’s been done before. Not only that, but it’s been done better many times before. You’ve probably already heard/read about how the film borrows plot points wholesale from other films, and everyone knows that when it comes to storytelling, it’s not what you tell, but how you tell it. However, Avatar does absolutely nothing revolutionary other than ramp up the special effects to 11. That’s it. If you aren’t wowed by visual splendor alone, then you can’t help but leave the theater wanting.

To make my point more clearly, let’s look at the film from a point of view that in no way focuses on the special effects. Imagine the film is a made-for-TV movie on the SyFy channel, where bringing attention to its special effects will end in tears. (“The filmmakers are doing the best they can! Leave ’em alone!”) Better yet, simply imagine that the film wasn’t made by James Cameron, it didn’t have a budget of $300 million, it didn’t have 15 years worth of preparation to make and that it certainly was not the result of the two largest and most adept visual effects houses on the planet (WETA and ILM) working together. It’s simply a movie with a story to tell.

'Avatar' tells the tale of a wounded, journal-writing soldier who goes to a remote outpost and ingratiates himself with the "primitive" indigenious people.

First, Avatar uses the same stark, condescending liberal guilt message that so many other movies have used before. Yes, we get it: Corporations and the military industrial complex are bad and people who love nature are good. Not only were those ideas played out years ago, but Avatar presents them with the subtlety of an exploding dumptruck filled with howler monkeys, all without nuance to the characters or their motivations. There are the evil people and the good people and they are presented in black and white with no shades of grey.

Let’s say, off the top of my head, the movie-going public was told that “unobtanium” — the precious mystery ore that brought the humans’ mining corporations and military to the alien planet of Pandora in the first place — could cure cancer, AIDS and all other Earthly diseases. It would’ve perhaps made the audience question the necessity of suffering and sacrifice and given an iota of complexity to the characters’ actions. Whose needs are more important: An entire planet of dying humans or a couple hundred aliens who are unwilling to move from their sacred patch of land? How can diplomacy be reached with an alien tribe who have nothing to gain by leaving and can’t understand the consequences in their refusal? You know, ideas that give both sides of a story and provoke thought.

But nope, we don’t get that. Instead, we get a clichéd, careless corporate CEO putting golf balls in his office and military brass sipping coffee as they all watch an entire race unnecessarily get wiped out by fire bombing and deforestation. You know, SUBTLETY!

James Cameron's 'Avatar' should be commended for mixing a heartfelt, pro-environment message with an original, fantasy setting that is easy for people to digest.

That brings me to another thing: the clichés. Most of the characters are one-dimensional archetypes at their best and shop-worn stock characters at their worst. A lot of the time, however, they can’t help being stereotypes given that they have lines like, “You’re not in Kansas anymore,” a line so clichéd that you’ll spit out cobwebs if you say it out loud. But that’s not the only example — not by a long shot. The filmmaker, in his infinite wisdom, settled on naming the MacGuffin in the film “unobtanium,” a name that sci-fi nerds, engineers and cinephiles literally laugh at while jokingly naming stupid mystical metals in theoretical thought experiments. Cameron could’ve taken 10 minutes out of his day to think of any other name so that we could take his not-even-thinly-veiled analogy on The War on Terror seriously. How about cantfindium? Or lostite? Or behindthatbushium?

I guess now is as good of a time as any to mention why I didn’t like the fact that James Cameron decided to use Avatar as a mouth piece for his thoughts on The War on Terror. And in case the analogy wasn’t obvious to the audience, Cameron again decided to kick subtlety in the face and had the marine colonel mention making a “preemptive strike” on the aliens and that they will “fight terror with terror,” which might have made sense had the nature-loving, life-respecting Na’vi forced suicide bombers to rush into military encampments at some point in the movie. Honestly, what sort of “terror” were the aliens responsible for? How can that reference make any sense at all in the context of this movie? This having an Iraqi/oil subtext feels tacked on and out of place, especially considering that it comes at the end of the movie. I was content to accept Avatar simply as a metaphor for the Colonial expansion on the Native Americans, but hey, why stop at just one obvious, clichéd, out-of-date analogy, right?

This all goes back to what I’ve said before that the whole movie has no voice of its own. It takes well-known, over-used ideas and throws in some special effects razzle dazzle so that you forget that you’ve already seen this film many, many times before.

'Avatar' is refreshing by being a family-friendly, interplanetary, 3D sci-fi film that denounces the industrial military complex and its encroachment on.... You get the picture.

The plot is derivative and unoriginal, the dialog is hokey as all hell and plotting is far from revolutionary. (“Gee, there’s the skull of that winged creature that has only been tamed 5 times in the history of the Na’vi. I wonder if that’ll come into play at some point in the movie.”) Some of the actors give competent performances in the film, but most of them are either wooden and bored or over-the-top scenery chewers. Although, to be fair, picking on a sci-fi film for having wooden or hammy acting is like picking on a SyFy original movie for its special effects. (“I said to leave ’em alone, jerk!”)

Cameron had $300 million dollars and 15+ years of development and this is the final result? The whole thing just feels like wasted potential…. Well, I guess misguided potential might be more accurate.

Look, if you enjoyed the movie for its spectacle and special effects, then more power to you. Go nuts and buy it ten times over when it comes out on DVD. All I ask is that you allow those of us that weren’t impressed to have our opinions and not bash us for them. We may be a minority now, but think about this: When Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace first came out, it was overwhelmingly enjoyed by both critic and fan alike, and the people who disliked it were in the minority…. Now look at it.

I haven’t seen better special effects,
but I’ve definitely seen better movies.

P.S. As a professional graphic designer, I take personal umbrage with the fact that they wrote the subtitles in Papyrus font. That shit’s fucking clownshoes.


4 Responses to Avatar Review

  1. Darby says:

    I think one of your most effective points, Boone, and the one all us plot/story/dialog buffs need to continue to bring up, is: imagine this movie DOESN’T have a half-trillion-dollar budget. Imagine special effects that might not be so special. Would you still watch the movie? Is any of it memorable APART from the technical wizardry? Does it leave you feeling dazed and unsatisfied? Then it’s not really a good film. It’s a glittery, noisy slot machine. And you just lost your money in it.

    Incredible technique in any medium has its limitations. I’ve personally never been that impressed with technically astounding, yet soulless, instrumental solos in music, or with amazing physical feats performed by bitches who use that success to be even bigger bitches (cough! McGwire! ahem, brehem). Photorealistic painting for photorealism’s sake does not a masterpiece make.

    The point of these otherwise pointless cultural diversions should be to help human beings evolve in terms of ideas, thought and feeling. If a TV show, movie, book, graphic novel, painting, whatever-the-hell, didn’t make you grow a tiny bit and only distracted you, then it’s utter crap. If it reinforced existing thoughts or feelings and didn’t make you think or feel anything new, then it’s crappy, but forgivable sometimes, I guess, since sometimes we need reassurance.

    Still, we should be aiming for culture that is both entertaining AND complex. That way you feel satisfied even after the distraction is over. It’s the difference between fast food and a gourmet meal from scratch. Okay, Avatar gave you a sugar high. But you’re gonna crash. And the next bit of junk isn’t going to work as well. It’s a nasty cycle.

    I’m sure James Cameron thought he was making a movie of the highest order, so I guess we needn’t egg his car or TP his house or anything. He can be forgiven. But we shouldn’t encourage (with our dollars and attention) cultural claptrap. It’s only going to lead to more of the stuff being produced, and less of the truly satisfying, meaty stuff.

  2. Darby says:

    I should also note, I don’t think all we should see are indie films or tortured dramas. There’s room for variety. But a movie – or whatever else – should be good for its particular genre and purpose. Die Hard as an action film, Shawshank Redemption as a drama, Empire Strikes Back for sci fi, etc. These are films that can be watched more than once, partly because they’re complex enough, but also because they’re entertaining.

  3. Boone says:

    Reviewer Jonathan Romney has perhaps the best quote about ‘Avatar’ ever:
    “‘Avatar’ is a phenomenon you can’t ignore, monumentally imposing and done with extraordinary expertise – but the same could be said of the Dubai skyline, and I’m not sure that represents any future worth investing in.”

    The future of film needs more than spectacle and special effects. You need to challenge people to be great, and that’s ultimately what bothered most about ‘Avatar’. I felt unchallenged, like I had seen it before, and I had. Many, many times before. And it’s odd to see everyone give it a pass despite its shortcomings. I just don’t get humanity sometimes.

  4. Laura Davidson says:

    Boone is far from being in the minority. Many old farts I know (over 50) and a few thinking critics I’ve read agree with his disappointment and dismay. Sadly we’ve become so accustomed to bad or nonexistent plot lines, recyled cliche-ridden dialog, and one dimensional characterizations that when we get something out of the ordinary (read: better special effects, 3-d glasses, bigger budget, arrogance and pubilicty)we whoop and holler about what a great effort it is. Cineplex movies have turned into pissing matches. Effort does not translate into quality! Thank goodness for NetFlix!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: